AASJournals / AASTeX60

Version 6 of the LaTeX style files and documentation for authoring AAS Journal (AJ/ApJ) articles.
https://journals.aas.org/aastex-package-for-manuscript-preparation/
LaTeX Project Public License v1.3c
46 stars 26 forks source link

Whitespace missing in rendered \software{} citations #73

Open adrn opened 6 years ago

adrn commented 6 years ago

With AASTeX6.2: image

With AASTeX6.1: image

Minimum working example here: https://gist.github.com/adrn/8620656f23d1166c6feadb6b3839af31/archive/b61ad6fe13e8b9f7e39c1a715a93a6ad8fd21aa9.zip

(this was also noticed by Erin Ryan)

erinleeryan commented 6 years ago

Yep, I'll confirm this bug!

screen shot 2018-11-07 at 3 06 30 pm
augustfly commented 6 years ago

I think that the bst file is out of date... using the newest does not produce that negative space.

yours: %% Revision 1.14 2016/10/5 Amy Hendrickson newest: %% Revision 1.16 2017/10/26 Amy Hendrickson

https://journals.aas.org/aastex-package-for-manuscript-preparation/

Of course upgrading to the newest bst file brings you a lot of new 'features' that some people don't like bc they don't want long bibliographies. but who prints things out, anyway?

adrn commented 6 years ago

Ah, interesting. So it's the confluence of new .cls file + old .bst file?

I still occasionally print out a paper - forgive me for I have sinned!

erinleeryan commented 6 years ago

Hmmm, I've still got the same issue with 6.2 cls and the new .bst in Overleaf, but if I start a new project in Overleaf I can't replicate it. Pants.

augustfly commented 6 years ago

the new bst encodes links for all references (if there are linkable identifiers in the bibtex) into the bibitems, but it includes the identifier as inline text rather than anchor text like yahapj. there's a reason for this, but it makes the reference section longer. it's probably not more than an extra tree or two per year...

i fear this is a very strange bug/aberration, so I'll keep this issue open for others who might have other related experiences. we can also look into it if/when we do v6.3.

adrn commented 6 years ago

Thanks @augustfly!