AArnott / CodeGeneration.Roslyn

Assists in performing Roslyn-based code generation during a build.
Microsoft Public License
408 stars 60 forks source link

[Proposal] Rename #164

Closed amis92 closed 4 years ago

amis92 commented 4 years ago

With #162 being a major rewrite, I thought it could be a good opportunity to mix it up a notch. We're considering breaking changes like #136 as well, which further "helps"

CodeGeneration.Roslyn as a name has the following properties:

I propose to rename this project to a more unique and maybe catchy one. 😏🦄

My (currently only one) proposal:

I'm very open for different proposals though. Please share yours!

PS. @aarnott I'd like to ask you for opinion in this matter. Do you think renaming this project is sensible? Discussable? And as an owner: given an interesting enough proposal, would you consider agreeing to that?

AArnott commented 4 years ago

Hmmm... let me stew on it a little while.

AArnott commented 4 years ago

Let's close on #100 before considering a rename here. @amis92 can you drive that to a conclusion?

amis92 commented 4 years ago

I've really wanted to not comment there as long as possible... ;)

amis92 commented 4 years ago

@AArnott see https://github.com/AArnott/CodeGeneration.Roslyn/issues/100#issuecomment-533647426

amis92 commented 4 years ago

Since Roslyn is deep in prototyping Source Generators, I think a rename in current timeframe is completely off the table.