Closed zhangjb35 closed 10 months ago
Hi @Jinboasltw - thanks so much for bringing this to our attention. I'm going to delete the subID information from this post because it is PHI for this study. I have assigned some folks from our lab, and we will get back to you as soon as possible with answers/actions.
Thanks! Happy Holidays!
Thanks. Sorry for ignoring the risk to show the full ID in the post. I just want to give some direct examples.
We need to verify that this information actually has been updated. If not, it should be updated in the new participants.tsv we are uploading soon.
Hi @Jinboasltw, we just uploaded the new participants.tsv to the collection on the NDA. This version should include the necessary fixes you had outlined in this issue. If you continue to encounter the issue though, please reopen this and we will get it addressed. Thanks for your patience!
Hi, I get the
participants_v1.0.0.zip
from NDA (https://nda.nih.gov/edit_collection.html?id=3165). After comparing it with the sites info provided by ABCD package, seem some participants with the wrong sites info for baseline measurement.for example, "sub-NDARINVXXXXXXXX" "ses-baselineYear1Arm1" "1" "site17" .... "sub-NDARINVXXXXXXXX" "ses-baselineYear1Arm1" "1" "site11" .... (this is from participants.tsv)
NDAR_INVXXXXXXXX,site11,... (this subject have multiple sites at the follow up measurement) (this is from ABCD)