Closed dougiesquire closed 9 months ago
Attention: 1 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Comparison is base (
f7ca779
) 97.31% compared to head (4024c97
) 97.31%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Thanks heaps @jo-basevi!
is the time data points normally at the start or end times, or is it impossible to know if there isn't known bounds? Just wondering if its better to have end/start times to be either +/- the frequency rather than half the frequency either side of start and end times.
I don't think it's possible to know where the time point is, unfortunately. However, I think the assumption that the time point is at centre of the averaging period makes the most sense. This is indeed the case for the data in the issues that motivated this PR (#113, #114).
RTD build is now failing. This PR does not update the docs, and I've opened an issue here https://github.com/ACCESS-NRI/access-nri-intake-catalog/issues/118, so merging
With this PR, when no time bounds are available in a file, a guess of the start and end dates are made based on the first and last time and the frequency.
@aidanheerdegen, @utkarshgupta95 this is definitely a yucky hack, but it should fix #113 and #114.
Closes #113, closes #114