Closed dougiesquire closed 3 months ago
Adding a "wave" realm means deviating even farther from the CMIP6 "realm" controlled vocab, which we currently follow with the addition of
"none"
and"unknown"
.
Is it worth making an issue to get a wave realm added to the WCRP controlled vocabs?
Is it worth making an issue to get a wave realm added to the WCRP controlled vocabs?
Somehow I don't think that would be an easy or quick process...
Somehow I don't think that would be an easy or quick process
Be the change you wish to see in the world
Closed by #161 and #162
With the addition of the ACCESS-OM3 builder, which can include WW3 data, it may be nice to add a "wave" realm to the schema. Currently the ACCESS-OM3 builder assigns wave data to the "ocean" realm, but having a "wave" realm will make it more findable. Adding a "wave" realm means deviating even farther from the CMIP6 "realm" controlled vocab, which we currently follow with the addition of
"none"
and"unknown"
.