Closed k-ormerod closed 4 months ago
Hi Katherine,
Thanks for bringing this up, I'll try to find time to look into it at some point soon.
Cheers, Adam
Thanks for catching this Katherine, I've been back through the commit history and can't find an obvious reason, I guess it was just a very old typo!
I have been fitting models with the Salim+2018 dust attenuation model, and I noticed when looking at how this was implemented that the width of the bump feature is input at 375A on the denominator.
I have updated this to 350A to be consistent across the implementation of the Drude profile and in line with the Salim+18 paper.