Open keflavich opened 2 years ago
Data look good. No problems here -- I think this is good as-is. Moving to 'Done' pile.
Note: the emission in the narrow SPWs is cut-off at the lower edge:
This is expected, as it was shifted to capture more emission on the other end. Here's the previous data for comparision (#35):
It'd be a good idea to image these data together eventually to capture all of the emission.
Hi @keflavich @d-l-walker
the weblog looks fine for spw 24 (as well as the fits in /product). However, the cube in /working/uid___A001_X15b4_X39.s12_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw24.cube.I.iter1.image.pbcor/ shows divergence at channel 626, 638, 639
Is this produced in newer version of pipeline? a reclean is necessary.
Cyclefactor increased from 1.5 to 2.0, and spw24 now shows divergence in a difference channel (634) while looks good in channels 626, 638, 639. I will try cyclefactor=3.0
Reimaged spw24 with cyclefactor=3.0 looks good, without apparent divergence.
Sgr_A_st_e_updated_03_7M uid://A001/X15b4/X39
[x] Observations completed?
[x] Delivered?
[x] Downloaded? (specify where)
[ ] Weblog unpacked
[x] Weblog Quality Assessment?
Extra Weblog Sgr_A_st_e_updated_03_7M_0 -> pipeline-20220720T105558, Extra Weblog Sgr_A_st_e_updated_03_7M_1 -> pipeline-20220728T051015
[x] Imaging: Continuum
[x] Imaging: Lines
Product Links:
Reprocessed Product Links: