Open keflavich opened 2 years ago
Looks fine in general.
Looks good.
It seems that the size mitigation problem has been solved in this pipeline run. However, although the final images exist in Globus, the weblog doesn't report anything. I will download the images from Globus and check them.
I don't find any image products in Globus produced by the hipergator pipeline run. The imaging should have failed and only left behind some intermediate products Since the hipergator imaging pipeline already has all the parameters for solving the size-mitigation issue, we may simply re-run it, as long as it can run to the end and produce the images. Is there such a way? @keflavich
These files all exist:
/orange/adamginsburg/ACES/data/2021.1.00172.L/science_goal.uid___A001_X1590_X30a8/group.uid___A001_X1590_X30a9/member.uid___A001_X15a0_X166/calibrated/working/uid___A001_X15a0_X166.s38_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw25.cube.I.iter1.image
/orange/adamginsburg/ACES/data/2021.1.00172.L/science_goal.uid___A001_X1590_X30a8/group.uid___A001_X1590_X30a9/member.uid___A001_X15a0_X166/calibrated/working/uid___A001_X15a0_X166.s38_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw27.cube.I.iter1.image
/orange/adamginsburg/ACES/data/2021.1.00172.L/science_goal.uid___A001_X1590_X30a8/group.uid___A001_X1590_X30a9/member.uid___A001_X15a0_X166/calibrated/working/uid___A001_X15a0_X166.s38_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw29.cube.I.iter1.image
/orange/adamginsburg/ACES/data/2021.1.00172.L/science_goal.uid___A001_X1590_X30a8/group.uid___A001_X1590_X30a9/member.uid___A001_X15a0_X166/calibrated/working/uid___A001_X15a0_X166.s38_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw31.cube.I.iter1.image
/orange/adamginsburg/ACES/data/2021.1.00172.L/science_goal.uid___A001_X1590_X30a8/group.uid___A001_X1590_X30a9/member.uid___A001_X15a0_X166/calibrated/working/uid___A001_X15a0_X166.s38_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw33.cube.I.iter1.image
/orange/adamginsburg/ACES/data/2021.1.00172.L/science_goal.uid___A001_X1590_X30a8/group.uid___A001_X1590_X30a9/member.uid___A001_X15a0_X166/calibrated/working/uid___A001_X15a0_X166.s38_0.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw35.cube.I.iter1.image
@keflavich SPW33 has the correct cube size (3840 channels), and there is an overwrite argument in the json file. The other SPWs are 2x binned.
for the non-spw33 bands, are the override_json commands correct?
One more question... should I keep the override command for SPW33 in the json file, or delete it (since it has been run and the image is available)?
keep it. These commands are our central record of what has been done.
The spw33 cube in globus looks great. The other spws are still 2x binned, and are probably still undergoing re-clean.
Moved unmitigated cubes to unmitigated/
directory. spw33 was OK, but the others need reimaging, as @xinglunju notes. Reimaging will happen shortly.
Mar 1 2023 update: SPW33 has been unbinned and the cube looks good. Cubes of the other 5 SPWs are still 2x binned on Globus. @keflavich
Yep. Looks like I managed to move the scripts to the unmitigated directory, not the cubes. Oops. Fixed now
All cubes look good. Marking this one as done.
A potentially interesting source:
The coordinate is roughly 17:48:18.512, -28:19:48.219
Seen as point-like absorption in all SPWs. Nothing can be found on SIMBAD catalogs. Could be a quasar??
The only emission is in SPW33, at ~99 GHz, which could be H40 alpha. The emission is also point-source-like, centered on this source.
Spectra of the six SPWs:
Update on that source:
Cont QA (spw25_27,spw33_35): some line contamination in 25_27, minimal in 33_35.
(upper 25_27, lower 33_35) 25_27 has improved, but 33_35 has definitely gotten worse. Not sure why, but there's clearly a lot more line contamination here. And the common bright source is now missing from the image and the residual.
We'll need to look into this one more - a bright source present in one sideband but not the other is likely an indication of contamination. Let's look at the continuum selection figures and check out the spectrum of that source.
The bright source is real, GPSR5 0.824-0.190, and has a whopping bright H40a recombination line and even an H50beta line. The continuum source is 30 mJy!
So the missing continuum is an indication of failed imaging.
Removed bad images:
mv *.spw33_35.* failed_20240520/
mv *.spw25_27_29* failed_20240520/
I will restart with identical parameters and hope the redo fixes the problem. If it does not, we may need further investigation - possibly this is caused by an incorrect data column selection as we recently saw in aj, p, & v (https://github.com/ACES-CMZ/reduction_ACES/issues/235#issuecomment-2120637880)
spw33_35 is restored
full aggregate is still cleaning
Sgr_A_st_ah_03_TM1 uid://A001/X15a0/X166
[x] Observations completed?
[x] Delivered?
[x] Downloaded? (specify where)
[x] Weblog unpacked
[ ] Weblog Quality Assessment?
Extra Weblog Sgr_A_st_ah_03_TM1_0 -> pipeline-20220914T134955, Extra Weblog Sgr_A_st_ah_03_TM1_1 -> pipeline-20221004T040402
[ ] Imaging: Continuum
[ ] Imaging: Lines
Product Links:
Reprocessed Product Links: