Execution Block ID uid://A001/X15a0/X110 Sgr_A_st_s_03_TP

[keflavich]

Sgr_A_st_s_03_TP uid://A001/X15a0/X110

• [x] Observations completed?
• [x] Delivered?
• [x] Downloaded? (specify where)
  • [x] hipergator
• [x] Weblog unpacked
• [x] Weblog Quality Assessment?
• [x] Imaging: Continuum

• [x] Imaging: Lines

  • [x] SPW16 H13CN
  • [x] SPW18 H13CO+/SiO
  • [x] SPW20 HCO+
  • [x] SPW22 HNCO
  • [x] SPW24 Cont 1
  • [x] SPW26 Cont 2

Product Links:

• member.uid___A001_X15a0_X110.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw27.cube.I.sd.fits
• member.uid___A001_X15a0_X110.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw17.cube.I.sd.fits
• member.uid___A001_X15a0_X110.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw19.cube.I.sd.fits
• member.uid___A001_X15a0_X110.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw21.cube.I.sd.fits
• member.uid___A001_X15a0_X110.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw25.cube.I.sd.fits
• member.uid___A001_X15a0_X110.Sgr_A_star_sci.spw23.cube.I.sd.fits

  Reprocessed Product Links:

[pyhsiehATalma]

Ripples in spw 27 (almost all EBs)

[pyhsiehATalma]

negative emission in spw 21 (HCO+). I have a feeling that it is due to baseline subtraction as we can see the baseline of HCO+ around 89.155 GHz is also negative, but not much we could do in this case unless we redo baseline subtraction. It doesn't help much though.

[pyhsiehATalma]

@keflavich excepts two issues reported above, I didn't find anything wrong. I moved this SB to "Completed execution blocks (imaging, QA, calibration all done)". Please let me know if the workflow is ok.

[keflavich]

Yes, this seems fine. At least, these are done until we come up with a better way to handle baseline subtraction

[eacmills]

Remaining baseline fitting issues for HCO+

Before/After