search

ACES-CMZ / reduction_ACES

Reduction scripts and tools for ACES
https://worldwidetelescope.org/webclient/?wtml=https://data.rc.ufl.edu/pub/adamginsburg/ACES/mosaics/mosaics.wtml
15 stars 12 forks source link

Scheduling Blocks that failed to restore #279

Open keflavich opened 2 years ago

keflavich commented 2 years ago

Each of these SBs appears to have some failure in the restoration, though some of them are marked as OK

These are the black fields in this image: image which (at least in some cases) indicates that the measurement set being imaged are not calibrated.

There may be a variety of underlying problems, but these seem to be fundamental and require either a helpdesk ticket or a re-download of the data.

d-l-walker commented 2 years ago

I'm a bit confused about #132 being in this list. I can see that in the image you've posted that it doesn't look right. But this is one that I reviewed and marked as 'Done', the images in this version of the weblog produced look OK to me?

https://data.rc.ufl.edu/secure/adamginsburg/ACES/weblogs/humanreadable/Sgr_A_st_ae_03_TM1_0/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage38&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html

The weblog for this run however looks bad, and the data are clearly uncalibrated: https://data.rc.ufl.edu/secure/adamginsburg/ACES/weblogs/humanreadable/Sgr_A_st_ae_03_TM1_1/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage10&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html

So it seems that the run using PL version 6.4.3.2 didn't work as expected, but the one with version 6.2.1.7 looks fine?

EDIT: Ok, so the run that looks fine is the one from JAO. The one that look uncalibrated is from the HPG run.

keflavich commented 2 years ago

Yes, exactly, that's the problem: the pipeline run here failed for reasons unknown.