Open keflavich opened 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about #132 being in this list. I can see that in the image you've posted that it doesn't look right. But this is one that I reviewed and marked as 'Done', the images in this version of the weblog produced look OK to me?
The weblog for this run however looks bad, and the data are clearly uncalibrated: https://data.rc.ufl.edu/secure/adamginsburg/ACES/weblogs/humanreadable/Sgr_A_st_ae_03_TM1_1/html/t2-4m.html?sidebar=sidebar_stage10&ms=all&subpage=t2-4m_details.html
So it seems that the run using PL version 6.4.3.2 didn't work as expected, but the one with version 6.2.1.7 looks fine?
EDIT: Ok, so the run that looks fine is the one from JAO. The one that look uncalibrated is from the HPG run.
Yes, exactly, that's the problem: the pipeline run here failed for reasons unknown.
Each of these SBs appears to have some failure in the restoration, though some of them are marked as OK
These are the black fields in this image:
which (at least in some cases) indicates that the measurement set being imaged are not calibrated.
There may be a variety of underlying problems, but these seem to be fundamental and require either a helpdesk ticket or a re-download of the data.