Open ashleythomasbarnes opened 1 year ago
Testing effect with and without the absorption feature flagged in https://github.com/ACES-CMZ/reduction_ACES/issues/266
Comparison of pipeline properties from weblogs
Property | With absorption feature | Without absorption feature |
---|---|---|
Phase calibrator calibration (spw 29) | ——————————— | ——————————— |
Renormalization (X2d13, x822c) | 1.030005, 1.029418 | 1.030005, 1.029418 |
Gfluxscale (mJy) | 613.723 | 656.982 |
Property | With absorption feature | Without absorption feature |
---|---|---|
Phase calibrator imaging (spw 29) | ——————————— | ——————————— |
Final theoretical sensitivity (mJy/beam) | 0.24 | 0.26 |
Clean residual peak | 4.56 | 4.08 |
Non-pbcor image RMS (mJy/beam) | 0.26 | 0.3 |
Pbcor image max / min (mJy/beam) | 611 / -1.02 | 653 / -0.953 |
Property | With absorption feature | Without absorption feature |
---|---|---|
Target imaging (spw 29) | ——————————— | ——————————— |
Final theoretical sensitivity (mJy/beam) | 10 | 10 |
Clean residual peak | -8.70 | -8.69 |
Non-pbcor image RMS (mJy/beam) | 10 | 10 |
Pbcor image max / min (mJy/beam) | 882 / -223 | 883 / -223 |
CONTINUUM
Summary -- differences in the continuum image - very minor but this is not surprising given that spw29 makes up only a small part of the continuum bandwidth
Cont emission map
Cont emission map difference
Cont emission map difference scatter plot
Cont emission map difference scatter plot - ratio of fractional difference on y-axis
Same as above but zoomed-in on y-axis
LINE - SPW29 MOM0
Integrated intensity moment map - flagged absorption feature
Integrated intensity moment map - flagged absorption feature difference
Integrated intensity moment map - flagged absorption feature difference
LINE - SPW29 MAX
Maximum moment map - flagged absorption feature
Maximum moment map - flagged absorption feature difference
Maximum moment map - flagged absorption feature difference
Splitting from https://github.com/ACES-CMZ/reduction_ACES/issues/178 to help tracking of this specific issue