Closed WillBaldwin0 closed 2 years ago
1 - please make a PR.
3 - I don't really see the problem with this; see the overview page. What would you like to have done differentlyu?
2 - the tutorials should have another section just like the LAMMPs tutorial
I will make a PR for 1 and 2. Also I realised that the landing page is missing key stuff so I'll add that.
With respect to 2, we have two different Julia versions of the tutorial. Are you keen to keep both of them?
You mean one for controlling ACE1 directly, the other via ACE1pack? We talked with Elena about this and I think she prefers to keep the ACE1pack version. And I definitely need to keep the "pure" ACE1 version.
I think Will meant that there are two in-Julia/ACE1 examples (without ACE1pack) in the docs currently. I think the most useful tutorials to keep would be command-line/JSON/ACE1pack and one of in-Julia/ACE1 (without ACE1pack).
I don't see a problem with that either - we make as many our as few as we like. Different tutorials have different use cases.
Just to follow-up on this, if you want more JSON-style tutorials, just bring them in. If you want to convert one of the ACE1-style tutorials into an ACEpack or JSON tutorial, that's all fine for me.
closing this issue after #50
there are some important tings which need to be fixed in the docs:
JulIP
rather thanJuLIP
even though I think we've fixed that. I presume this will go away when we push another change to the installation file?