Open jthorton opened 5 months ago
Yes we should do that, I am wondering why the name is pymace @davkovacs, I thought we were going for mace-torch just like pypi.
It looks like someone from the community made the conda-package, is the plan to also create mace-torch
or should we just reach out and also become maintainers of pymace
and promote that installation pathway?
it would be better to keep mace-torch as the name
We should make it mace-torch
and ask the person making pymace
to remove the package.
Okay you should be able to copy the recipe of pymace
and change the name to mace-torch
and add that, note you might need to add something which does not allow people to install them both at the same time as well.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Now that mace is available with all dependencies via conda-forge as
pymace
it would be great to have the install instructions also updated!