Hello! After delving into your insightful article and carefully reading the accompanying code of MACE, I have a query that I would greatly appreciate your clarification on. I noticed that in the higher-order tensor products described in your article, there is no explicit consideration for parity (or inversion) equivariance – specifically, parity indices are not included in the provided formulas. Therefore, I am wondering whether MACE is designed to support equivariance under the E(3) group or the more specialized SE(3) group.
I am looking forward to your valuable insights, which I am confident will significantly enhance my understanding. Thank you in advance for your time and assistance.
Dear Developers,
Hello! After delving into your insightful article and carefully reading the accompanying code of MACE, I have a query that I would greatly appreciate your clarification on. I noticed that in the higher-order tensor products described in your article, there is no explicit consideration for parity (or inversion) equivariance – specifically, parity indices are not included in the provided formulas. Therefore, I am wondering whether MACE is designed to support equivariance under the E(3) group or the more specialized SE(3) group.
I am looking forward to your valuable insights, which I am confident will significantly enhance my understanding. Thank you in advance for your time and assistance.
Best regards, Yang Zhong