Closed HTJense closed 7 months ago
After speaking with @thibautlouis, we came to the conclusion that it is "easier" to write explicitly the multipole ranges. Actually, the TE/ET
spectra breaks the generality of spectra scales and it is not easy or useful to use anchor/alias provided by yaml
syntax.
Here are the cuts used for unblinding
Array | T | P |
---|---|---|
pa4_f220 |
1000 | - |
pa5_f090 |
1000 | 500 |
pa5_f150 |
800 | 500 |
pa6_f090 |
1000 | 500 |
pa6_f150 |
600 | 500 |
Below is the relevant part of the yaml
to be updated
# Specify default set of spectra and scale cuts
# to be used
defaults:
polarizations: [TT, TE, ET, EE]
polarizations_auto: &polarizations_auto [TT, TE, EE]
lmax: &lmax 8500
scales:
TT: [2, *lmax]
TE: [2, *lmax]
ET: [2, *lmax]
EE: [2, *lmax]
# If True, TE' = (TE + ET) / 2 will be used
# instead of TE and ET separately.
symmetrize: false
data:
experiments:
- dr6_pa4_f220
- dr6_pa5_f090
- dr6_pa5_f150
- dr6_pa6_f090
- dr6_pa6_f150
spectra:
- experiments: [dr6_pa4_f220, dr6_pa4_f220]
polarizations: &polarizations_pa4_f220
- TT
scales: &scales_pa4_f220
TT: [1000, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa4_f220, dr6_pa5_f090]
polarizations: *polarizations_pa4_f220
scales: *scales_pa4_f220
- experiments: [dr6_pa4_f220, dr6_pa5_f150]
polarizations: *polarizations_pa4_f220
scales: *scales_pa4_f220
- experiments: [dr6_pa4_f220, dr6_pa6_f090]
polarizations: *polarizations_pa4_f220
scales: *scales_pa4_f220
- experiments: [dr6_pa4_f220, dr6_pa6_f150]
polarizations: *polarizations_pa4_f220
scales: *scales_pa4_f220
- experiments: [dr6_pa5_f090, dr6_pa5_f090]
polarizations: *polarizations_auto
scales:
TT: [1000, *lmax]
TE: [1000, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa5_f090, dr6_pa5_f150]
scales:
TT: [1000, *lmax]
TE: [1000, *lmax]
ET: [800, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa5_f090, dr6_pa6_f090]
scales:
TT: [1000, *lmax]
TE: [1000, *lmax]
ET: [1000, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa5_f090, dr6_pa6_f150]
scales:
TT: [1000, *lmax]
TE: [1000, *lmax]
ET: [600, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa5_f150, dr6_pa5_f150]
polarizations: *polarizations_auto
scales:
TT: [800, *lmax]
TE: [800, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa5_f150, dr6_pa6_f090]
scales:
TT: [1000, *lmax]
TE: [800, *lmax]
ET: [1000, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa5_f150, dr6_pa6_f150]
scales:
TT: [800, *lmax]
TE: [800, *lmax]
ET: [600, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa6_f090, dr6_pa6_f090]
polarizations: *polarizations_auto
scales:
TT: [1000, *lmax]
TE: [1000, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa6_f090, dr6_pa6_f150]
scales:
TT: [1000, *lmax]
TE: [1000, *lmax]
ET: [600, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa6_f150, dr6_pa6_f150]
polarizations: *polarizations_auto
scales:
TT: [600, *lmax]
TE: [600, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
We can discuss the details on slack.
I have addressed these changes in #9 in preparation for the sim runs.
Updated the DR6 likelihood data cuts corresponding to the unblinding cuts: