Closed markusfiebig closed 6 months ago
Hydrometeor includes liquid cloud, ice particles, drizzle, rain, so not all particles are precipitating. However, vertical (and horizontal) air motion means that there can be a significant hydrometeor flux without any precipitation present. Note that these mass fluxes are not necessarily with respect to the surface, for surface fluxes we would include a surface (sfc) prefix to the variable names.
But if I interpret your words correctly, then "hydrometeor downward flux at the surface" is the same as "precipitation"?
Only precipitation at the surface, not in the atmosphere. In principle, hydrometeor downward flux at the surface could include situations such as dew or frost, which is not from precipitation..
Should we then have "precipitation" as separate matrix, with the definition:
hydrometeor downward flux at the surface, including dew, frost, and fog
?
Precipitation implies droplets/drops with appreciable terminal fall velocity, whereas there can be a flux of any droplets/particles due to air motion. Precipitation at the surface is therefore not quite the same as precipitation in the atmosphere
Solved!
We are in the process of defining vocabulary for variables describing deposition chemistry (needed to make EBAS content visible).
@swr99ejo , would, in your head, precipitation mass flux a.k.a. wet deposition , be the same as hydrometeor mass flux ? If so, why do we use hydrometeor instead of precipitation ?
This is related to issue #11 .