Closed thijssnelleman closed 2 weeks ago
It seems that this implementation of parallel portfolios only runs a set of solvers on a bunch of instances, which is not what a parallel portfolio should do (see comments above). This should be addressed before the PR can be merged.
Running the example parallel_portfolio_runtime.sh
shows an PAR10 score of the portfolio of 4817.01, which cannot be possible with a cutoff time of 60 seconds.
What is the purpose of cancelled and best solver for the portfolio table in the report? Als tables are missing captions and are not centred.
Report is also written to Output/Selection, which should be changed to ParallelPortfolio
Major refactor of parallel portfolio.