Closed skeys closed 9 years ago
Finally, are we happy with "observationBatch" as a root element? How about simply "ades"?
"observationBatch" would make more sense. "ades" does not correspond to the document contents: the document does not contain a standard but information that complies to it. Metonymy is acceptable still but may introduce confusion.
Since there are apparently at the moment:
I would suggest 3 acceptable roots identifying the contents.
abandoned
An XML document must have a single "root element" that contains all other elements. For MPC submissions, this is pretty clearly
observationBatch
but I wasn't sure if that made sense for other (non-submission) uses. I had been thinking maybe justobservations
could serve as a root element in cases where there was no submission header. But my recent proposal on versioning would need a place for schema information. Mixed in with the observations doesn't seem best. A separate root element would be better. Maybe all ADES XML files should have the same root element. We could just say this isobservationBatch
so a non-submission might look likeOr we use a
meta
tag like HTML to contain things such as schema information:I don't have strong feelings either way about a meta tag.
Finally, are we happy with "observationBatch" as a root element? How about simply "ades"?