vizipi[bot]
commented
1 year ago Pull request analysis by VIZIPI
Below you will find who is the most qualified team member to review your code. This analysis includes his/her work on the code included in this Pull request, in addition to their experience in code affected by these changes ( partly found within the list of potential missing files below ) Feedback always welcome
Reviewers with knowledge related to these changes
| Match % | Person | Commit Count | Common Files |
|---|---|---|---|
| 76.92 % | AbigailDeng | 47 | 10 |
| 30.77 % | lhoopox | 2 | 4 |
Potential missing files from this Pull request
files commonly committed with a subset of this pr, but not committed this time. (click to collapse)
| File | Percentile | rate |
| jest.browser.config.js | 50.00 % | 1 out of 2 times |
| types/util/proto.d.ts | 50.00 % | 1 out of 2 times |
| tsconfig.json | 50.00 % | 1 out of 2 times |
| types/index.d.ts | 50.00 % | 1 out of 2 times |
| types/wallet/index.d.ts | 50.00 % | 1 out of 2 times |
| README.md | 50.00 % | 1 out of 2 times |
| CHANGELOG.md | 50.00 % | 1 out of 2 times |
| test/unit/util/bloom.test.js | 50.00 % | 1 out of 2 times |
| types/util/keyStore.d.ts | 50.00 % | 1 out of 2 times |
| test/unit/chain/index.test.js | 50.00 % | 1 out of 2 times |
Committed file ranks
(click to expand)
95.95%[dist/aelf.cjs.js.map] 68.02%[src/util/bloom.js] 97.57%[dist/aelf.umd.js] 95.95%[dist/aelf.umd.js.map] 80.97%[src/util/utils.js] 99.60%[package.json] 0.00%[test/e2e/wallet.test.js] 0.00%[src/index.js] 99.19%[yarn.lock] 97.57%[dist/aelf.cjs.js]
Google Chrome 115.0.5790.102 produces incorrect SHA-256 hashes
When js-sha256 is used in chrome, there will be occasional problems in generating hash. Refer to the following method to use @aws-crypto/sha256-js
reference link： js-sha256 issue