Closed goern closed 2 years ago
Sounds like a good idea! I previously created a new-idea
label, which could be used for your first use case.
Using #12 as an example, we closed the issue once the talk was given (adding supporting docs for the talk is a ➕ ). Maybe we want a lifecycle/accepted
label to show which talks were accepted?
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close
.
/lifecycle stale
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close
.
/lifecycle rotten
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen
.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
.
/close
@sesheta: Closing this issue.
Shall we create labels for this repo so that we can manage the lifecycle of a talk?
if the issue is closed, it is done, how do we show if it was accepted or if the issue is closed with the talk having been held?
/assign @durandom /assign @isabelizimm /kind question /priority important-soon