[BUG]: It's skipping almost every relevant job

AIHawk-co / Auto_Jobs_Applier_AI_Agent

Auto_Jobs_Applier_AI_Agent by AIHawk is an AI Agent that automates the jobs application process. Utilizing artificial intelligence, it enables users to apply for multiple jobs in an automated and personalized way.

https://aihawk.co/

Other

22.16k stars 3.26k forks source link

[BUG]: It's skipping almost every relevant job #756

Open Pointfit opened 1 week ago

Pointfit commented 1 week ago

Describe the bug

I have a clear list of jobs to apply to with NO blacklisted jobs

Steps to reproduce

positions:

Data
Analytics
Analytics Engineer
Software engineer
Software Developer
Data Analyst
Data engineer
Data scientist
SQL
Software Engineer I
Developer

Expected behavior

Applying to all these jobs

Actual behavior

Skipping them, sometimes even applying to irrelevent jobs

Branch

None

Branch name

No response

Python version

No response

LLM Used

OpenAI

Model used

gpt-4o-mini

Additional context

No response

49Simon commented 1 week ago

This should not happen, there is a feature where it sends the job description and your resume to the LLM you're using and it scores your suitability for the job. It only applies for scores >= 7.

Can you share screenshot of the logs and see what the score and reasoning is for the jobs it is not applying?
You can change the condition to a value less than 7 and apply to jobs with lower suitability score.

sirraht commented 1 week ago

I'm seeing the same issue. I'm on branch release/v11.01.2024.

AIHawk is skipping jobs that I'm looking to apply to.

In config.yaml, I specify:

positions:

Head of Professional Services
VP of Professional Services
VP Professional Services
Director of Professional Services
Director Professional Services

I'm attaching my "skipped.json" and "success.json". HawkAI is applying successfully to jobs with lowest condition value, skipping my targeted job. skipped.json success.json

feder-cr commented 1 week ago

@surapuramakhil

Pointfit commented 1 week ago

@49Simon you are right, after reading the logs more carefully the LLM's reasoning makes sense as to why it is not applying.

I guess my feature request would be a more organized log of LLM's reasoning to apply/not apply to jobs.

Also for the change of code: I would change both the 7's into a 6 for example, in that function.

49Simon commented 6 days ago

In the next release, there will be a JOB_SUITABILITY_SCORE variable where users can change it to any value they want. This will give flexibility to apply to more jobs.

I don't think there's a bug related to this issue at this moment.

surapuramakhil commented 6 days ago

@49Simon can you ping me on discord