Figure overview

[erwinlambert]

Fig 1: Schematic overview of models, increasing complexity. 3-5 panels (M, PICO, plume, PICOp, Layer, (MITgcm)) Can introduce a colorscheme for the models here to be used throughout in lineplots and for subplot titles/borders

Fig 2: Spatial ISOMIP. 4x2 panels. Or 3x3 with one panel for 2 colorbars

• 1: Geometry + inset forcing + marked grounding zone
• 2-8: models

Fig 3: Sensitivity ISOMIP. 3 panels.

• 1: Average melt vs deep T
• 2: Melt sensitivity vs deep T
• 3: Grounding zone melt vs deep T. Alternative: max melt, 95th percentile, ...

Fig 4: Validation PineIsland warm. 3x3 panels

• 1: Geometry + inset forcing tanh2(ztcl=-400,Tdeep=1.2). Perhaps also show Dutrieux14 profiles for that period.
• 2: Observations from Shean
• 3: Colorbars
• 4-9: Models (M+, PICO, plume, PICOp, Layer, MITgcm). MITgcm as validation or part of model hierarchy?

Fig 5: Validation Dotson cold. 3x3 panels. Could be moved to appendix/SI

• 1: Geometry + inset forcing tanh2(ztcl=-700,Tdeep=.7). Perhaps also show Jenkins18 profiles.
• 2: Observations from Gourmelen
• 3: Colorbars
• 4-9: Same as Fig 4

Fig 6: Amundsen Sea cold period. 3x2 panels. If including Getz, stack 6 horizontal panels Forcing: PIG,Thwaites: tanh2(ztcl=-600,Tdeep=1.2). CrossDots (and Getz): tanh2(ztcl=-700,Tdeep=.7)

• 1-5: Models (M+, PICO, plume, PICOp, Layer)
• 6: MITgcm 2013-2017= cold period in model

Fig 7: Amundsen Sea warm-cold. 3x2 panels. Forcing: PIG,Thwaites: tanh2(ztcl=-400,Tdeep=1.2). CrossDots (and Getz): tanh2(ztcl=-400,Tdeep=.7)

• 1-5: Models (M+, PICO, plume, PICOp, Layer)
• 6: MITgcm 2008-2012= cold period in model

[AJueling]

(Figure numbering as suggested above)

@erwinlambert

• [ ] check validation whether melt rate given as ice or water
• [ ] final tuning for Layer
• [x] rerun all simulations
• [x] commit Figs. 4/5 code
• [x] create Fig 6,7 code
• [ ] send all the data
• [ ] tuning section 2.5 to methods: describe Layer procedure

@AJueling

• [ ] tuning aim for reasonable COLD/WARM/WARM-COLD rates PineIsland and Crosson/Dotson, write about this in tuning section
• [ ] check negative melt rates for Plume/PICOP (for the text/maybe plotting)
• [ ] check my models whether melt rate given as ice or water
• [x] redo Fig. 2 maybe combine with suggested Fig. 3
• [x] add models to Figs. 4/5
• [ ] check Fig. 2 colorscale
• [x] make Erwin's Obs table into figure