I'm running the "LIA_SpkDet — I-vector System" tutorial and noticed using the pre-built binaries gave different (much better) results from recompiling binaries on my machine.
Any pointers what the issue was? Thank you.
My machine: Linux Ubuntu 12.04 (also tested on MacOS Sierra 10.12.6, giving the same results i.e. different from pre-built binaries)
How I'm compiling:
Spro 4.1:
./configure
make
copy spro.h and system.h into include/ folder
copy libspro.a into lib/ folder
alize-core:
aclocal
automake --add-missing
autoconf
./configure
make
make install
LIA_RAL:
aclocal
automake --add-missing
autoconf
./configure --with-spro=[absolute path to spro] --with-alize=[absolute path to alize-core]
make
make install
My data: .wav audio files; extract features with Spro.
You copied spro.h and system.h into include/ folder. What include folder do you mean? Is it somewhere in the LIA_RAL project? the same Q about copyinglibspro.a into lib/ folder. which lib?
I'm running the "LIA_SpkDet — I-vector System" tutorial and noticed using the pre-built binaries gave different (much better) results from recompiling binaries on my machine.
Any pointers what the issue was? Thank you.
My machine: Linux Ubuntu 12.04 (also tested on MacOS Sierra 10.12.6, giving the same results i.e. different from pre-built binaries)
How I'm compiling:
Spro 4.1:
./configure
make
spro.h
andsystem.h
intoinclude/
folderlibspro.a
intolib/
folderalize-core:
aclocal
automake --add-missing
autoconf
./configure
make
make install
LIA_RAL:
aclocal
automake --add-missing
autoconf
./configure --with-spro=[absolute path to spro] --with-alize=[absolute path to alize-core]
make
make install
My data: .wav audio files; extract features with Spro.