Closed lofstrandbjorn closed 4 years ago
Rationale:
Otherwise there is no way to programmatically find out what is supported by a plugin.
I understand that Tasks and Reports are optional but what is the difference between SimCon and TaskManagement interactions and why should the QueryCapabilitiesSupported not be a TaskManagement interaction?
Some time ago we had a discussion if MagicMove and MagicResource should be part of ETR. We concluded maybe not, but keep them in for now. And put them aside under Simulation Control - SimCon.
For reasons - currently - unknown the two capability related tasks ended up there too. Need to check why.
I agree with @lofstrandbjorn and propose to move the capability interactions to task management group. Second, magic move and magic resource belong to the task group, IMHO. Further question arises from that: Do we need to reply with a taskstatusreport for these interactions?
Regarding the SimCon group, I would see a new NETN SMC, for example. As its not related to a specific entity, at first.
QueryCapabilitiesSupported and CapabilitiesSupported moved to TaskManagement
Is there a rationale or reason for QueryCapabilitiesSupported and CapabilitiesSupported to be SimCon interactions and not TaskManagement?