Closed garethsb closed 5 years ago
It seems to make little sense to have "invisible" footnotes in Markdown. Perhaps break out into visible Normative Reference section, and where possible have reference hyperlinks going directly to documents (such as RFCs).
These aren't really "footnotes", they are reference links -- they are helpful to save repetition, to avoid having target URLs in the body of the doc. And to save repetition.
We've used this approach many times before, e.g. the NMOS technical overview and BCP-003-01.
But the syntax was wrong for this document, so I've fixed all that and added a missing link.
As mentioned, you see a list of references in the Markdown but not in the rendered version. Personally I think that's ok.
OK, hadn't seen this in IS-04 or IS-05, but makes sense now, thanks, Peter.
The links to footnotes in https://github.com/AMWA-TV/nmos-api-security/blob/v1.0-dev/best-practice-authorisation.md don't seem to do anything, and nor are the footnotes themselves rendered. Not sure that GitHub-flavour markdown supports footnotes out of the box?