Closed garethsb closed 4 years ago
One concern that has been raised with this is whether for example when running SR-IOV on a NIC, any or all LLDP transmissions from the virtual function interfaces will reach the switch that's part of the IS-06 system. If not, the network controller would not be able to identify where the Endpoint is connected automatically and it must be registered with the attached_network_device
info.
The best practice would be to enable LLDP on every network device and endpoint, and mandate that the IS-04 Node includes interfaces.attached_network_device
but since it is hard to change IS-04 in this regard, this proposed change, plus a warning in the IS-04 Node test suite (https://github.com/AMWA-TV/nmos-testing/issues/491) could be the best option.
I understand that we would need to make attached_network_device optional for IS-04 consistency but as discussed offline there are cases in BC/NC communication where device info is mandatory. BTW I merged pull request ..Sachin
Make Endpoint
attached_network_device
optional - though strongly recommended - to allow operation in the case that these details are not available to the BC, cf. IS-04 Node /selfinterfaces.attached_network_device
being optional.Reasonable?