search

ANTsX / ANTsR

R interface to the ANTs biomedical image processing library
https://antsx.github.io/ANTsR
Apache License 2.0
127 stars 35 forks source link

DOI for ANTsR #11

Closed armaneshaghi closed 9 years ago

armaneshaghi commented 9 years ago

We could get a DOI for ANTsR and make the whole software citable. Objections?

Step by step guide:

https://guides.github.com/activities/citable-code/

bkandel commented 9 years ago

Not sure if we should do this or go for a proper publication in JSS or similar. Brian--do you have thoughts?

On 11 February 2015 at 09:44, Arman Eshaghi notifications@github.com wrote:

We could get a DOI for ANTsR and make the whole software citable https://zenodo.org. Objections?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/stnava/ANTsR/issues/11.

stnava commented 9 years ago

i would prefer to try http://www.jstatsoft.org/

brian

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:50 AM, bkandel notifications@github.com wrote:

Not sure if we should do this or go for a proper publication in JSS or similar. Brian--do you have thoughts?

On 11 February 2015 at 09:44, Arman Eshaghi notifications@github.com wrote:

We could get a DOI for ANTsR and make the whole software citable https://zenodo.org. Objections?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/stnava/ANTsR/issues/11.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/stnava/ANTsR/issues/11#issuecomment-73892903.

armaneshaghi commented 9 years ago

That would be excellent...

jefferis commented 9 years ago

Just to add that jss can take a while if you want something in the interim I have used zenodo.org.

Sent from my iPad

On 11 Feb 2015, at 06:44, Arman Eshaghi notifications@github.com wrote:

We could get a DOI for ANTsR and make the whole software citable. Objections?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

stnava commented 9 years ago

interesting comments here: http://robjhyndman.com/hyndsight/jss-rpackages/

stnava commented 9 years ago

another fantastic reference: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947308001606

bkandel commented 9 years ago

My inclination is that it's worth it to do it "properly" and get it up to JSS standards, and then have one unambiguous place to cite, even if it takes a few months more to get out. We've invested enough time in this package that it's worth it to do the "advertising"/taking credit properly.

On 11 February 2015 at 15:58, stnava notifications@github.com wrote:

interesting comments here: http://robjhyndman.com/hyndsight/jss-rpackages/

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/stnava/ANTsR/issues/11#issuecomment-73963364.

stnava commented 9 years ago

agreed ... and it's good to know, now, what the "beyond cran" standards of jss are ....

brian

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:04 PM, bkandel notifications@github.com wrote:

My inclination is that it's worth it to do it "properly" and get it up to JSS standards, and then have one unambiguous place to cite, even if it takes a few months more to get out. We've invested enough time in this package that it's worth it to do the "advertising"/taking credit properly.

On 11 February 2015 at 15:58, stnava notifications@github.com wrote:

interesting comments here: http://robjhyndman.com/hyndsight/jss-rpackages/

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/stnava/ANTsR/issues/11#issuecomment-73963364.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/stnava/ANTsR/issues/11#issuecomment-73964460.

armaneshaghi commented 9 years ago

nice blog post for JSS standards, definitely worth the time, I'm sure we will all be learning lots of things in the process (as I have already learned a lot). Am happy to work on this even if it takes a year or so

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:34 AM, bkandel notifications@github.com wrote:

My inclination is that it's worth it to do it "properly" and get it up to JSS standards, and then have one unambiguous place to cite, even if it takes a few months more to get out. We've invested enough time in this package that it's worth it to do the "advertising"/taking credit properly.

On 11 February 2015 at 15:58, stnava notifications@github.com wrote:

interesting comments here: http://robjhyndman.com/hyndsight/jss-rpackages/

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/stnava/ANTsR/issues/11#issuecomment-73963364.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/stnava/ANTsR/issues/11#issuecomment-73964460.