Closed agt24 closed 6 years ago
this is a bug.
brian
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Adam Thomas notifications@github.com wrote:
I'm having some trouble installing ANTsR with the recommended devtools command: (devtools::install_github( "stnava/ANTsR" )
The confirgure script appears to run ITKR::itkVersion() to find the ITK include directories. It returns 4.11, but all of the files the ITKR installation (which occurred immediately before) are labelled ITK-4.9:
ITKR::itkIncludes() [1] "itkIncludes: itk includes do not exist" /home/adamt/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/3.3/ITKR/libs/include/ITK-4.11/> ITKR::itkVersion() [1] "4.11" system("ls /home/adamt/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/3.3/ITKR/libs/include/") ITK-4.9
Any ideas on the cause of the mismatch?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/stnava/ITKR/issues/8, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AATyfkq-eeb7T9oq9uD5eKfT4fTD56x0ks5qXmsNgaJpZM4JRFAZ .
Thanks for the quick reply. Should I fall back to v0.0.1-alpha? Or is there a quicker workaround?
am updating ants, itkr and antsr to 4.11 now. it may be fixed in latest set of pushes. am testing on osx/linux/travis so we'll see soon.
brian
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Adam Thomas notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply. Should I fall back to v0.0.1-alpha? Or is there a quicker workaround?
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/stnava/ITKR/issues/8#issuecomment-234068310, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AATyfthcujxvmisJgz__fuAaQlhSC-aXks5qXoHkgaJpZM4JRFAZ .
Seems to work now. Thanks.
@stnava you can close this.
I'm having some trouble installing ANTsR with the recommended devtools command:
(devtools::install_github( "stnava/ANTsR" )
The configure script appears to run ITKR::itkVersion() to find the ITK include directories. It returns 4.11, but all of the files the ITKR installation (which occurred immediately before) are labelled ITK-4.9:
Any ideas on the cause of the mismatch?