search

AOSC-Dev / aosc-os-abbs

ABBS/ACBS tree for AOSC OS package metadata, build configuration, scripts, and patches
https://packages.aosc.io
GNU General Public License v2.0
101 stars 80 forks source link

binutils: libbfd-*.so.* file version problem #2082

Closed eatradish closed 8 months ago

eatradish commented 4 years ago

I noticed that the file names of our bindutils all have date names like /usr/lib/libbfd-2.33.1.20191220.so, which seems to cause some problems, such as https://github.com/AOSC-Dev/aosc-os-abbs/issues/2072 .

eatradish commented 4 years ago

Why source not use https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-$VER.tar.xz ?

MingcongBai commented 4 years ago

@eatradish Like Glibc and GCC, fixes are pushed to the release branch and they don’t tend to release further patch releases. Not our fault.

LionNatsu commented 4 years ago

@MingcongBai For better understanding of our policy for this particular case, could you give us some examples of what kind of fixes we need beyond the releases they tagged?

MingcongBai commented 4 years ago

@LionNatsu https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/binutils-2_33-branch As you can see, more fixes are commited after the last tag (2.33.1).

LionNatsu commented 4 years ago

@MingcongBai It's a calendar actually. Nah, just joking.

MingcongBai commented 4 years ago

@LionNatsu Well actually if you look at GCC (which is really the worst offender here)... Emm, it's still (mostly) a calendar, but hey, less work for us.

MingcongBai commented 3 years ago

Dropping shared libbfd in next Core patch release (forgotten).

jiegec commented 8 months ago

Done.