AOtools Paper

[matthewtownson]

Hi all (@andrewpaulreeves @james-m-osborn @GillesOrban @ojdf),

I'm not sure I have up to date email addresses for everyone, so adding an issue to hopefully catch my out of date email addresses. Also let me know if I have forgotten someone I should have included.

I am hoping to submit the AOtools paper by the end of next week, if no-one has any major changes to make to the paper. If you don't have access then let me know an up to date email address so I can add you to edit the doc. AOtools_paper.pdf

Thanks, Matt

[GillesOrban]

Hi Matthew,

Thank you to have included me in the paper! I am currently on holidays for the next two weeks, so I have only read quickly the paper. It looks good to me. It is good to have a lot of snippet code. Otherwise, there are a couple of typos here and there.

Could you just correct the following:

• write in full my family name: Orban de Xivry (I don’t have a middle name)
• for my affiliation, you can use : Space sciences, Technologies & Astrophysics Research (STAR) Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium

Many thanks to have put this together. Do you plan to submit it to Optics Express?

Regards, Gilles

De: "Matthew Townson" notifications@github.com À: "AOtools/aotools" aotools@noreply.github.com Cc: "Gilles Orban de Xivry" gorban@uliege.be, "Mention" mention@noreply.github.com Envoyé: Lundi, Juillet 22, 2019 12:22:04 PM Objet: [AOtools/aotools] AOtools Paper (#47)

Hi all ( @andrewpaulreeves @james-m-osborn @GillesOrban @ojdf ),

I'm not sure I have up to date email addresses for everyone, so adding an issue to hopefully catch my out of date email addresses. Also let me know if I have forgotten someone I should have included.

I am hoping to submit the AOtools paper by the end of next week, if no-one has any major changes to make to the paper. If you don't have access then let me know an up to date email address so I can add you to edit the doc. AOtools_paper.pdf

Thanks, Matt

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub , or mute the thread .

[matthewtownson]

Yes, the plan is to submit to optics express.

Would you prefer to have a proper look when you get back from holiday? We can delay submitting until the 16th August to give you time when you get back. Alternatively, if you are mostly happy I can make the changes you suggest and get it submitted sooner.

[andrewpaulreeves]

Hi All,

Thanks for putting this all together! It's looking good.

Some tweaks from me that I've made in the overleaf doc: 97: Note that dependencies are all standard tools 100: Added reference to being useful in FSOC. I added a ref but it doesn't seem to add it properly in the PDF - any ideas?

Throughout a few tweaks to typos, grammer, etc...

Figures + snippets - can the figures be joined somehow with their respective snippet? Even if they are together in the same PDF figure file so they are definitely together? I guess if they are seperate then its up to the editor how they are ultimately placed.

Other discussion point - 0.6 is still highlighted. Should a goal be to release v1 for this paper? I think we are happy with structure, and naming schemes, etc... so changes in the near future shouldn't be breaking, just adding stuff

Cheers,

Andrew

p.s. how does collaborative Overleaf work - are my changes flagged up to you somehow?

[matthewtownson]

Thanks for the updates to the paper, I have tracked changes turned on so we can see what is being updated.

Putting the snippets and figures together sounds like a good idea, I will get to work on that this week.

As for version number, I was hoping to call it v1.0 just before submission assuming no-one thinks there's anything major about to change (I don't think there is)

[GillesOrban]

Thanks Matthew. No need to delay the submission for me. As I said, it looks good. If I have any other suggestion, I let you know.

[matthewtownson]

Congrats and thanks everyone for the hard work. Our paper can be found here.