@APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to review new MAJOR issues since last meeting.
Request: @APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to add any additional issues for discussion to the agenda
Issues only to be discussed by exception Request: @APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to add any issues for discussion to the agenda
@APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to review RP 'tagged' issues
Request: @APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to add any additional issues for discussion to the agenda
7.2 (Development of guidelines for modules): RP to consider how to allow (or should there be allowance) for developers not able (capable?) to comply
7.2 (ApsimX user uptake slow): RP to discuss and review.
7.3 (Update on AI funded projects and proposals): AI RP to consider the UQ request to extend the current arrangement for Drew which is a 50:50 basis with the AI through to December 2021.
7.3 (List of Areas for Potential funding): RP to provide final approval. PO to inform AI SC and Project Group of outcome and approval.
7.1 (uJV Review): RP to finalise a proposal for consideration by the AI SC.
7.6 (Communications Update): DH, PdV, KP and others to review options and report back to the AI SC.
2020-10 Agenda
Members: Video/Teleconference:
@peter-devoil; @yashvirchauhan; @peter-devoil; @MarkLieffering; @LouisAK; @jbrider; @sarahcleary; @Keith-Pembleton; @sarchontoulis ; @EnliWang; @HamishBrownPFR; @kchenu; @JulianneLilley; @hol353
Apologies: @sno036;
Tuesday 6th October 2020 - 9:30 am AEST
Agenda Item
1.1 Welcome/Apologies
Welcome from @peter-devoil
1.2 Review Minutes
Review Minutes: 2020-09 Minutes
2. Science/Software
2.1 Check for new APSIM Major Improvements
GitHub MAJOR science issues
@APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to review new MAJOR issues since last meeting. Request: @APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to add any additional issues for discussion to the agenda
GitHub ALL science issues
Issues only to be discussed by exception Request: @APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to add any issues for discussion to the agenda
@APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to review RP 'tagged' issues Request: @APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to add any additional issues for discussion to the agenda
Discussion on whether these are the right categories for 'weekly' review. If so, should there be any form of definition/scope for tagging issues. Issues requiring RP Review and/or Oversight - Classic Issues requiring RP Review - NG Issues requiring RP Oversight - NG
Issues only to be discussed if not already on the agenda
https://github.com/APSIMInitiative/ReferencePanel
2.2 Updates from RP on models and reviews
Models under development
Note any new models under development and assign RP member to provide ‘oversight’
Add P to Nutrient Model
Models currently under review
Sorghum model
Soybean Model
New Stock Model
Models requiring review
Any new models requiring review?
Models/Updates in release since last RP meeting
None
3 Software
-- Naming of APSIM Next Gen - https://github.com/APSIMInitiative/ApsimX/issues/4690
-- Guidelines for Development include discussion on @hut104's comment - https://github.com/APSIMInitiative/ReferencePanel/issues/63. As per requirement from AI SC meeting - RP to consider how to allow (or should there be allowance) for developers not able (capable?) to comply
-- How to stop ApsimNG overwriting saved version of model?
4 Outstanding Actions
To be discussed by exception - Actions to be discussed.
-- Concept Note - https://github.com/APSIMInitiative/ReferencePanel/issues/
-- Outstanding Action: @JulianneLiley to draft News article with regard to Erik's retirement
-- Infrastructure discussion - https://github.com/APSIMInitiative/ReferencePanel/issues/69
-- Workshop on soil “P” - next step?
-- Review remaining actions (https://github.com/APSIMInitiative/ReferencePanel/issues) - should these to closed or put on 'standard' review list?
5 Project/Funding Proposals
@APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to bring ideas to the next meeting for funding by the APSIM Initiative
Review submission by @sarchontoulis - https://github.com/APSIMInitiative/ReferencePanel/issues/71
6 Training and Support
Next Gen Doc - https://github.com/APSIMInitiative/ReferencePanel/issues/42 - Next Step/s?
Update on APSIM Week
-- Discussion on timeline -- Timing for contact of presenters/participants
Support
Questions: APSIMX Questions APSIM Classic Questions
Disucssion on 'stalebot'
Training
7 RP Roles and Responsibilities
Discussion/Finalisation of https://github.com/APSIMInitiative/ReferencePanel/issues/51
Outstanding action from last RP meeting:
@kchenu questioned the "validation evidence" requirement. ACTION: discussion in next RP meeting and/or via GitHub
8 Other Business
-- Next AI SC meeting - Wednesday 25/11. Pending Actions? https://github.com/APSIMInitiative/ReferencePanel/issues/9
Actions as per minutes:
7.2 (Development of guidelines for modules): RP to consider how to allow (or should there be allowance) for developers not able (capable?) to comply
7.2 (ApsimX user uptake slow): RP to discuss and review.
7.3 (Update on AI funded projects and proposals): AI RP to consider the UQ request to extend the current arrangement for Drew which is a 50:50 basis with the AI through to December 2021.
7.3 (List of Areas for Potential funding): RP to provide final approval. PO to inform AI SC and Project Group of outcome and approval.
7.1 (uJV Review): RP to finalise a proposal for consideration by the AI SC.
7.6 (Communications Update): DH, PdV, KP and others to review options and report back to the AI SC.
AI Software Position update - updated document?
Discussion on APSIM IP - as per email
9 Next Meeting
3 November 2020 - 9:30am