search

APSIMInitiative / ReferencePanel

2 stars 2 forks source link

# 2020-12 Agenda #78

Closed sarahcleary closed 3 years ago

sarahcleary commented 3 years ago

2020-12 Agenda

Members: Video/Teleconference:

@peter-devoil; @yashvirchauhan; @MarkLieffering; @LouisAK; @jbrider; @sarahcleary; @Keith-Pembleton; @sarchontoulis ; @EnliWang; @HamishBrownPFR; @kchenu; @JulianneLilley; @hol353; @sno036;

Apologies: TBA

Tuesday 1st December 2020 - 9:30 am AEST

Agenda Item

1.1 Welcome/Apologies

Welcome from @peter-devoil

1.2 Review Minutes

Review Minutes: 2020-11 Minutes

2. Science/Software

2.1 Check for new APSIM Major Improvements

GitHub MAJOR science issues

@APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to review new MAJOR issues since last meeting. Request: @APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to add any additional issues for discussion to the agenda

GitHub ALL science issues

Issues only to be discussed by exception Request: @APSIMInitiative/reference-panel to add any issues for discussion to the agenda

2.2 Updates from RP on models and reviews

Models under development


Models requiring review

Any new models requiring review?


Models/Updates in release since last RP meeting

3 Software

-- Naming of APSIM Next Gen

4 Outstanding Actions

To be discussed by exception - Actions to be discussed.

-- Concept Note

-- Infrastructure discussion

-- Workshop on soil “P”

-- How to stop ApsimNG overwriting saved version of model?

5 Project/Funding Proposals

Projects for potential funding

Update post AI SC meeting

6 Training and Support

Communication Update

Communications - APSIM Website and ResearchGate Updates

Update on APSIM Week

Apsim Week

Update post AI SC meeting

-- ACTION: RP to review and discuss: Online Training/Update- What are we trying to achieve; What is required to achieve this

-- Request from Daniel Rodriguez with regard to the Australian Agronomy Conference - October 2021. -- Discussion on book vs special issue of journal. Should this be something we look at?

Support

Questions: APSIMX Questions APSIM Classic Questions

7 Invited Speakers

To be included in future meetings?

8 RP Roles and Responsibilities

Discussion/Finalisation of RP "principles of membership"

-- Action from AI SC meeting: RP to develop a role statement for RP Representatives --- includes tasks but also expectations such as flagging new developments early

9 Other Business

-- Actions from AI SC meeting - Wednesday 25/11.

IP Discussion - Finalise the discussion ACTION: RP to consider the scenario raised by PT which involved a process where there is line of sight, potentially negating the need for owning the code on conception.

Guidelines for naming models that function in APSIM vs APSIM models Provide guidelines for users with regard to badging their models as APSIM prior to AI RP peer review.

**Guidelines and Protocols of how the AI manages Data" Will require defining the different types of data Providing scope around what the AI requires from each type of data - access for what purposes

New pulse varieites

New Meeting Structure -- start in 2021?
-- Comfortable with 4 meetings - placeholders for 4 day long meetings; 3 to be 4-6 weeks prior to the AI SC meeting and a Strategy meeting in Q1? -- Placeholders for 'ad-hoc' meetings - would 9-10am QLD time, 1st Tuesday of the month suit?

9 Next Meeting

To be discussed

sarahcleary commented 3 years ago

@APSIMInitiative/reference-panel - agenda items to be added post AI SC meeting on Wednesday

sarahcleary commented 3 years ago

Does this issue: https://github.com/APSIMInitiative/ApsimX/issues/4381 warrant being on the agenda?

sarahcleary commented 3 years ago

Please note new item in "Other Business"

New Meeting Structure -- start in 2021?
-- Comfortable with 4 meetings - placeholders for 4 day long meetings; 3 to be 4-6 weeks prior to the AI SC meeting and a Strategy meeting in Q1? -- Placeholders for 'ad-hoc' meetings - would 9-10am QLD time, 1st Tuesday of the month suit?

sarahcleary commented 3 years ago

Additional action from AI SC meeting

-- 8 RP Roles and Responsibilities - RP to develop a role statement for RP Representatives

sarahcleary commented 3 years ago

New point under agenda item 9: Guidelines for naming models that function in APSIM vs APSIM models Provide guidelines for users with regard to badging their models as APSIM prior to AI RP peer review.

sarahcleary commented 3 years ago

New point under agenda item 9: **Guidelines and Protocols of how the AI manages Data" Will require defining the different types of data Providing scope around what the AI requires from each type of data - access for what purposes

sarahcleary commented 3 years ago

Included: IP Discussion - Finalise the discussion ACTION: RP to consider the scenario raised by PT which involved a process where there is line of sight, potentially negating the need for owning the code on conception.

sarahcleary commented 3 years ago

Final item arising from AI SC meeting: ACTION: RP to review and discuss: Online Training/Update- What are we trying to achieve; What is required to achieve this