APTG / 2022_DCPT_LET

MC particle transport simulations for the 2022 LET-measurements at DCPT
7 stars 0 forks source link

7 add topas simulations #12

Closed Villadslj closed 1 year ago

Villadslj commented 1 year ago

Hej

Here is the Topas simultions of the 160 MeV, 160 MeV 1 MU, 2 Gy SOBP and 100 Gy SOBP.

There is plots for 2 Gy SOBP.

-Villads

grzanka commented 1 year ago

@Villadslj please adhere to the directory structure mentioned here: https://github.com/APTG/2022_DCPT_LET#directory-structure

grzanka commented 1 year ago

Couple of remarks:

grzanka commented 1 year ago

@Villadslj what is the coordinate system you are using: IEC with beam going towards positive/negative Y axis ? or is it "MC convention" system when beams goes along positive Z ? This is crucial for interpreting the results.

Villadslj commented 1 year ago

We have an in-house software program to convert the dicom files to TOPAS files, (Not sure if I can share it, will check). As for the having the beam in the negative Y-axis, the dicom plan has the gantry in in 0 degree position, so that is why. did not want to rotate the the whole beam, bench and everything

grzanka commented 1 year ago

We have an in-house software program to convert the dicom files to TOPAS files, (Not sure if I can share it, will check). As for the having the beam in the negative Y-axis, the dicom plan has the gantry in in 0 degree position, so that is why. did not want to rotate the the whole beam, bench and everything

I think it's important point. With SHIELD-HIT12A I simulate the beam going along Z axis, as this is most commonly used convention in MC codes. I suspect other codes (i.e. Fluka) may do the same. Having beam along Z axis would then simplify comparison between various MC codes.

For comparison with TPS I would re-arange the data during binary data -> DICOM transition.

@nbassler what is your opinion ?

grzanka commented 1 year ago

Have you commited all the changes marked as done here:

image

I still see the old version here:

image

Villadslj commented 1 year ago

Have you commited all the changes marked as done here:

image

I still see the old version here:

image

I have now... (sorry)