Closed xypron closed 1 year ago
Should we have some wording in EBBR suggesting/mandating that FW create the conformance profiles table?
The UEFI 2.10 spec says: "The absence of this table shall indicate that the platform implementation is conformant with the UEFI specification requirements, as defined in Section 2.6." But this does not include the extra requirements of the EBBR.
If the software is fully compliant to the EBBR, it could add said GUID to the table. If it is not fully compliant it should not add the GUID I guess.
U-Boot adds the GUID if elements required by the EBBR but optional in U-Boot are enabled in the configuration
efi: ECPT add EBBRv2.0 conformance profile https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/commit/648a8dcb39306ebd32353d6c503ac3b69e064190
config EFI_EBBR_2_0_CONFORMANCE
bool "Add the EBBRv2.0 conformance entry to the ECPT table"
depends on EFI_ECPT
depends on EFI_LOADER_HII
depends on EFI_RISCV_BOOT_PROTOCOL || !RISCV
depends on EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL || !DM_RNG
depends on EFI_UNICODE_COLLATION_PROTOCOL2
default y
Provide a GUID that can be used in the EFI Conformance Profile Table to indicate conformance with the EBBR 2.0 specification.
Fixes: #95 Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com