Open mbrossard opened 2 years ago
I'm afraid we can't have duplicates in the database.
Board IDs and targets should only be added once the names are confirmed and expected to be publicly released in the future.
I'm afraid we can't have duplicates in the database.
There are precedents (K64F
, LPC11U24
, LPC1347
, LPC4330_M4
).
Board IDs and targets should only be added once the names are confirmed and expected to be publicly released in the future.
Support is publicly available: https://github.com/microbit-foundation/mbedos-microbit-v2-starter
CC: @microbit-carlos, @jaustin
@MarceloSalazar These are not duplicates, they reflect different board revisions and pop options. micro:bit tools use the different board IDs to automatically provide users with the correct software components.
Having distinct IDs is the only option since there is no other way to encode a board revision in the board ID. (Even CMSIS-DAP v2.1 doesn't add a board revision field to DAP_Info, although I'm proposing this be added.)
Description
Add micro:bit board IDs to platform database.
Pull request type
Reviewers
@MarceloSalazar @Patater