Open CalvoM opened 3 years ago
@CalvoM thank you for raising this issue.Please take a look at the following comments:
Could you add some more detail to the description? A good description should be at least 25 words.
NOTE: If there are fields which are not applicable then please just add 'n/a' or 'None'. This indicates to us that at least all the fields have been considered. Please update the issue header with the missing information, the issue will not be mirrored to our internal defect tracking system or investigated until this has been fully resolved.
Thank you for raising this detailed GitHub issue. I am now notifying our internal issue triagers. Internal Jira reference: https://jira.arm.com/browse/IOTOSM-3926
Any progress on this?
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-connectivity Please review
@CalvoM for future reference this is usually the kind of question that might be best asked in our forums https://forums.mbed.com/c/mbed-os/6 .
Description of defect
I am currently writing integration tests for our network components. We are using SIMCOM modem, i.e. SIM5360E, and thus we extended the Cellular Library to support SIMCOM. However, when we write the integration tests for the network functionality, the integration do not go past the svcXX parts e.g. the svcMutex found here. So, we sought to see how the already built Cellular libraries like Ublox are tested, so that we could find guidance, but we found none. Thus my question, does anyone have links for tests for such cellular libraries so that we could find help or even better, how to solve this svc issue we have in testing? We are using a PCB with NUCLEO-F429ZI chip and GCC_ARM toolchain. Mbed trace is disabled. Thanks in advance.
Target(s) affected by this defect ?
Currently tested on NUCLEO_F429ZI
Toolchain(s) (name and version) displaying this defect ?
GCC_ARM
What version of Mbed-os are you using (tag or sha) ?
mbed-os-6.10-0
What version(s) of tools are you using. List all that apply (E.g. mbed-cli)
mbed-cli
How is this defect reproduced ?
n/a