Open forrestfwilliams opened 8 months ago
Notably, FFTW 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 are available on conda-forge, so it should be straightforward to link to that instead: https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/fftw
I think it would be okay to use a different version? Let's check with Howard to see what he thinks. If FFTW on conda-forge can easily be utilized by fortran and c then it shouldn't be a problem.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 1:25 PM Joseph H Kennedy @.***> wrote:
Notably, FFTW 3.3.9 and 3.3.10 are available on conda-forge, so it should be straightforward to link to that instead: https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/fftw
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ASFHyP3/back-projection/issues/14#issuecomment-2025848871, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWOVQ43Y5OCANCTGNUHPTM3Y2RN7ZAVCNFSM6AAAAABFNH2E36VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAMRVHA2DQOBXGE . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Closing as the vendored FFTW was removed in PR #17
From @jhkennedy in PR #11 :
Because of this, we should make sure that we create a way to install the workflow in this repository without vendored code. Instead, we should install fftw from its source.
@kspepin would also enjoy your thoughts on this.