Closed hobu closed 6 months ago
Weird... I thought I left a comment when I edited the tags last month, but apparently it didn't stick. Sorry about that. If you want to pre-emptively reserve that code for LAS 1.5 in LASF_Projection I think that's fine. We just need to include that in the LAS 1.5 spec.
In today's conf call we decided that a new VLR will not be needed for WKTv2, except for the one described in #129
What is the issue about?
Inquiry about the specification, Other
Issue description
The PDAL community intends to start using
LASF_Projection:4224
to insert WKTv2 content into LAS files. While we could be usingPDAL:4224
to do this (like we did way back in the day withlibLAS:2112
), the intention is that LAS 1.5 is going to provide WKTv2 support, and it would make sense to declare which record ID the specification would use.Additionally, we would also plan to start using
PDAL:4225
to insert PROJJSON VLRs. PROJJSON is a faithful alternative encoding of WKTv2 that is more convenient and does not require a custom parser for syntax validation (it uses json-schema). The committee might consider making a statement about using PROJJSON too, although which to prefer when is likely to get confusing.