Closed SophieHYe closed 6 years ago
There is no human analysis for those patches
It's an open question whether we should use them. We don't want to overflow the paper with patches of our own tools that are not formally part of peer-reviewed papers.
Hi @monperrus @martinezmatias @tdurieux
There are 103 nopol patches from result of March 2017: https://github.com/Spirals-Team/defects4j-repair/tree/master/results/2017-march and 153 Dynamoth patches from https://github.com/tdurieux/dynamoth-experiments/tree/master/results/2017-november.
I would like to know have they been manual analyzed as correct patches or plausible patches?
In addition, there is no patches from jkali, should we add them?