Add accepted papers, demos/posters, DCs, and other artifacts to webpage

[jonfroehlich]

See the email thread entitled "Should we make a webpage that lists all accepted content?"

Some of you have suggested that with registration now open, that we should consider posting all accepted papers, demos, etc. to help inform people's decisions about whether to register.

So, I wanted to surface that idea here. If we think this is a reasonable idea, we would have to create a well-formatted website that shows all accepted content across the various tracks (say, an "Accepted Work" page at accepted_work.html).

We voted positively to do this. Hugo shared that actually it's been done before: https://assets21.sigaccess.org/accepted_papers.html

Someone in the TPC needs to share a spreadsheet of all accepted content and we need to come up with a clean HTML/CSS design to render it. I think it can go under the Program dropdown in navbar:

[jonfroehlich]

The TPC has delivered us a nice list of all accepted papers, authors, and affiliations (for primary paper track).

It's in this Google Doc

[judykong97]

Done. Should I publish?

[jonfroehlich]

Wow, that was incredibly fast. Let me send to TPC to see what they think. The paper title font is a bit large for my eyes (but maybe good for accessibility purposes!).

[jonfroehlich]

We now have accepted posters/demos listed here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hOFELf4Atiu9w_kStu8T7vVVZxz7QExRqhpG05OrIlo/edit#heading=h.kh7l1ap6prlw

(Can one of you give me access? I changed the GDoc to private so I could put it here and then lost access).

[judykong97]

It shows on my end that you have access to the doc (with your UW email) - can you access it now?

[judykong97]

Done with the draft https://assets-conference.github.io/assets2022/accepted-posters-and-demos.html

I left a few comments in the google doc regarding things I noticed that might need double checking.

[jonfroehlich]

Wonderful. Just sent email to Hugo and Taslima to help respond to those comments/questions.

[jonfroehlich]

Here are the Experience Reports: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-nvDRS9bi9wE4UBrPlZtnsnYICqfQxZ-NBxKuyzA3EM/edit?usp=sharing

[judykong97]

Thanks! I edited the posters and demos page according to the comments, and pushed to production. I should be able to work on the Experience Reports page in the next couple of days but needing a bit of time.

[jonfroehlich]

Thank you @judykong97. Totally get it.

[judykong97]

Sorry about the delay - Done. Here: https://assets-conference.github.io/assets2022/accepted-experience-reports.html

c6272bcee6e53aa875f70ce9c3c05c80275a40ac 23593ba628413fb3abb50ae6a81bd6f54d1e6b05

[jonfroehlich]

Looks good!

(Note that if you reference this Issue in your commit comments (https://github.com/ASSETS-Conference/assets2022/issues/74), it will auto-show up here thereby creating a nice link between your code and the Issue).

[jonfroehlich]

I guess the last big one is accepted DCs? Can you work with the DC chairs on this? We're close!

[judykong97]

Done. The DC chairs got back with the content and I sent the draft page to the DC chairs. https://assets-conference.github.io/assets2022/accepted-doctoral-consortium.html

[judykong97]

The DC chairs thought the draft was good and I pushed the page to production. https://assets22.sigaccess.org/accepted-doctoral-consortium.html

All pages related to this issue should be done and in production right now.

[jonfroehlich]

Looks like a wonderful set of papers. Thanks @judykong97 for your great work here!