Some editing for better readability.

[MAnalytics]

To be completed by me today (22/01/2018) RR• Ensuring that there is at least one place in the main text that reference each figure. This is currently not the case for many of the figures. (Figures 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 4.1, 4.3, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 5.1, 6.4, 6.5)

RR• Ensuring uniformity in the use of 'Fig.' and 'Figure' in the main texts. I like the latter.

RR• Add some texts to properly describe Figure 2.2. The figure actually describes the lack of cycling lanes on most of roads in Accra and Kathmandu, and the presence of cycling lanes in Bristol.

R• Removing the grey shadows behind some of the figures to ensure uniformity

RR• What about adding Table 5.1 and Table 5.2 as images (for better control of the formatting). We need to change the capture of Figure 4.4 and Figure 4.5 to Table 4.1 and Table 4.2, respectively.

To be completed by @Robinlovelace • Ensuring that the ‘header’ is not truncated’. “Estimating cycling potential on the ……open data and ope”. Or replace with a shortened paraphrase like: “Estimating cycling potential in Accra and Kathmandu using open source resources” o Removing the dates in the ‘header RR• Is it possible to ensure that the two figures placed side by side in figures 5.1 and 8.1 are roughly the same size (particularly, their ‘heights’)?

RR• Centralising all the tables

Monsuru.

[mpadge]

@geoMADE Great stuff! Note that i've just done a commit of README.Rmd, but without corresponding changes to README.md. Just in case you're still working on this, could you please regenerate and commit the .md (I'm currently mobile and can't compile it). Thanks!

[MAnalytics]

I have just made a commit to the .md file now. @mpadge Thanks.

[MAnalytics]

Hi @Robinlovelace @mpadge

I have resolved most of the issues created here.

RR• indicates resolved R• indicates partially resolved.

I think the remaining thing is to address the truncating 'header'

[Robinlovelace]

Thanks - I can sort that one.