Update factory_position.md

[tronta]

Is this correct? I

[AaronErhardt]

It's basically correct, but you could theoretically also specify the width and height (how much rows and columns the widget takes).

Also I would put it a little different:

"The task of the position function is mainly to map the index to a specific position (x, y, width and height) of a factory widget inside the parent widget (view)."

[tronta]

What about area?

[AaronErhardt]

What do you mean with area?

[tronta]

The task of the position function is mainly to map the index to a specific area (x, y, width and height) of a factory widget inside the parent widget (view).

I mean something with width and height is an area, isn't it?

[AaronErhardt]

Oh, yeah technically you're right. But maybe position is still easier to understand? Because area in this case means only a part of the area of the grid which is not really intuitive, I guess.

[tronta]

My personal intuition is that the position is only x, y. An additional argument for using an other word could be to not only repeat the function name, but provide an alternative word. Maybe location could also be a good additional description, what do you think? We could also write position/location, position/area…

[AaronErhardt]

Yeah, I think writing position/area is probably the best solution.

[AaronErhardt]

Perfect :+1: