Closed tomasdundacek closed 2 years ago
I didn't realize the "should" matchers were still supported by RSpec.
I am also aware, that calling
.new
on an interaction is not an intended way of using this gem, but it really helps while testing validations :)
Calling .new
is fine and is and intended use.
interaction filter instance variables are now separated from original inputs
I'm not sure what you mean by that.
Ultimately, I surprised this ever worked. It was probably a bug that it did work. The gem doesn't use presence of validation. It has it's own check and adds the same error but it's not actually using validates :foo, presence: true
in the code.
Hi, I have encountered the following "bug", I'm rather asking for the intentions behind the commit below or if there possibly is a bug indeed:
Summary The commit https://github.com/AaronLasseigne/active_interaction/commit/abb5de10da0f2048ef600e9a50cb00de6b136fba (in version 4.0.2) has broken the cooperation between ActiveInteraction and shoulda-matchers, since interaction filter instance variables are now separated from original inputs.
Example app The app has one
rspec
test:Sidenote: the app uses rails 6, since rails 7 was not supported when AI 4.0.2 was released
Solution I'm not sure, why the commit mentioned above was introduced, so I am not sure what the solution to this issue is. I am also aware, that calling
.new
on an interaction is not an intended way of using this gem, but it really helps while testing validations :)Thanks!