Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Looks reasonable. We probably should push more of the CPU-specific
configuration into the variants/ header files, but this seems like a reasonable
approach in the meantime.
Original comment by dmel...@gmail.com
on 26 Nov 2011 at 3:06
Great. If you apply this, please also apply issue 727 OR let me submit an
"#ifdef 1284P" version of 727 if you don't like how that patch approaches the
problem. Note that 727 exactly follows the model of pushing "more of the
CPU-specific configuration into the variants/ header files".
Original comment by maniac...@ymail.com
on 27 Nov 2011 at 6:21
https://github.com/arduino/Arduino/commit/d7d0e304d53b8a75d61b1976ffe8a92d38e867
e2
https://github.com/arduino/Arduino/commit/eb380de9726d90d937f2d70d4b94bb60578316
c7
Original comment by dmel...@gmail.com
on 2 Dec 2011 at 10:23
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
maniac...@ymail.com
on 24 Nov 2011 at 10:03Attachments: