Small Area Population Estimates Scotland 2019

[BScheliga]

Mid-2019 Population Estimates Scotland (https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/statistics-and-data/statistics/statistics-by-theme/population/population-estimates/mid-year-population-estimates/mid-2019) (WILL not be used. Below, will be used instead)

This give us the Mid-2019 Population Estimates Scotland based in Datazones https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/statistics-and-data/statistics/statistics-by-theme/population/population-estimates/2011-based-special-area-population-estimates/small-area-population-estimates/mid-2019

• [x] retrieve data set

• [x] download the metadata

• [x] download key and additional documents

• [x] process data set for linkage

• [x] archive the metadata

• [x] archive key and additional documents Could not find official Key for data (29/09/2020)

• [ ] create unofficial key information

• [x] email Creator and asked about DOI & full citation of dataset (emailed 29/09/2020)

• [x] permanent identifiers Update: got emailed back (29/09/2020): They don't have a DOI, but use permanent links for their open data set statistics.gov.scot

• [x] full citations Update: got emailed back (29/09/2020): Mid-2019 Small Area Population Estimates for 2011 Data Zones. In place of an author name "National Records of Scotland"

• [ ] publish to DaSH catalogue

• [ ] publish to ACHDS

[BScheliga]

@JessButler This is an example. How I would see us utilising the "issues". I think, if we treat each data set as one issue and use tasks and milestone we will have a better overview on the progress of the project. What do you reckon?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukYSRu4k0gs nice short video on Issues and task

[JessButler]

Brilliant! That's perfect. I'll remove the other issues and let's adopt this way