Closed rdroms closed 7 years ago
Hm. On reflection, it seems like this first bullet in the Problems section is more correctly an observation or a fact that then leads to specific problems. Perhaps this text could be moved up near the discussion of Special-Use Domain Names, as an outcome of the fact of SUDNs and text that helps understand some of the specific problems in section 2.
You're right, this is background information. It's also not entirely correct, in the sense that it lets out the possibility of special-use names that are both "reserved by the IETF" and "part of the public root zone." And I don't like the last bullet—if we know of some other such thing, we should enumerate it, but I don't think we do, and the text implies that we've left out something we know, when we haven't.
Updated bullet list:
* Reserved by the IETF for technical purposes
* Assigned by ICANN to the Global DNS root; some names reserved
by the IETF for technical purposes may appear in the Global DNS
root for reasons pertaining to the operation of the DNS
* ICANN Reserved Names; names that may not be applied for as TLDs
(see [SDO-ICANN-DAG]Section 2.2.1.2.1, Reserved Names )
* Commandeered for use by other organizations
* Names that are unused and are available for assignment to one
of the previous categories
lgtm
Based on the default font in my browser, I interpreted the first character of "lgtm" as 0x49, which left me scratching my head. Makes more sense when I interpret it as 0x6C.
I suggest we move this list up between the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs of the Introduction, perhaps leading with a sentence like:
Based on current ICANN and IETF practice, including RFC 6761, there are several different types of names in the root of the Domain Namespace:
Reserved by the IETF for technical purposes
Assigned by ICANN to the Global DNS root; some names reserved by the IETF for technical purposes may appear in the Global DNS root for reasons pertaining to the operation of the DNS
ICANN Reserved Names; names that may not be applied for as TLDs (see [SDO-ICANN-DAG]Section 2.2.1.2.1, Reserved Names )
Commandeered for use by other organizations
Names that are unused and are available for assignment to one of the previous categories
wfm
(hopefully that's less ambiguous... :)
WFM
Discussed with Ralph, changing bullet #2 to something like: ICANN Reserved Names; names that may not be applied for as TLDs (see [SDO-ICANN-DAG]Section 2.2.1.2.1, Reserved Names, Section 2.2.1.4.1 Treatment of Country or Territory Names, et all )
OLD (was in section 3):
o There are several different types of names in the root of the Domain Namespace:
* Reserved by the IETF for technical purposes
* Assigned by ICANN to the public DNS root
* ICANN Reserved Names; names that may not be applied for as a
TLD (see [SDO-ICANN-DAG]Section 2.2.1.2.1, Reserved Names )
* Commandeered for use by other organizations
* Not a member of any other category
NEW (now in section 1, 3rd para):
Based on current ICANN and IETF practice, including RFC 6761, there are several different types of names in the root of the Domain Namespace:
o Reserved by the IETF for technical purposes
o Assigned by ICANN to the public DNS root; some names reserved by the IETF for technical purposes may appear in the Global DNS root for reasons pertaining to the operation of the DNS
o ICANN Reserved Names; names that may not be applied for as TLDs (see [SDO-ICANN-DAG], Section 2.2.1.2.1, Reserved Names, Section 2.2.1.4.1, Treatment of Country or Territory Names, et al.)
o Commandeered for use by other organizations
o Names that are unused and are available for assignment to one of the previous categories
From Suzanne Woolf https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg19170.html
Problems associated with Special-Use Domain Names