The modifications in r148 mixed up the usage of < and > for < and >.
< was used for > whereas > would have been right.
Should be fixed in order to not confuse the developers using the api.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by mart-...@gmx.net on 12 Jun 2009 at 9:56
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mart-...@gmx.net
on 12 Jun 2009 at 9:56