#217: JaCoCo Report workflow is not checking server module coverage

AbsaOSS / atum-service

Apache License 2.0

5 stars 1 forks source link

#217: JaCoCo Report workflow is not checking server module coverage #218

Closed benedeki closed 2 months ago

benedeki commented 2 months ago

added check on server coverage
added optional check on overall coverage of modules
rename of some variables

Closes #217

github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

JaCoCo model module code coverage report - scala 2.13.11

Overall Project	60.74%	:green_apple:

There is no coverage information present for the Files changed

github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

JaCoCo agent module code coverage report - scala 2.13.11

Overall Project	86.35%	:green_apple:

There is no coverage information present for the Files changed

github-actions[bot] commented 2 months ago

JaCoCo server module code coverage report - scala 2.13.11

Overall Project	64.04%	:green_apple:

There is no coverage information present for the Files changed

benedeki commented 2 months ago

Last idea: How about overall values per module?

This is already a long workflow, with a proclivity for typo errors or omitting stuff (like modules). A creation of dedicated action is the way to go forward.