search

AbsaOSS / fa-db

Functional Access to Database
Apache License 2.0
3 stars 0 forks source link

#126: Bring workflow actions up to date #127

Closed benedeki closed 5 months ago

benedeki commented 5 months ago

Closes #126

lsulak commented 5 months ago

What about RN check, as was done in https://github.com/AbsaOSS/atum-service/pull/212/files ?

actually even release.yml is quite old, I mean the whole pipeline and its approach

benedeki commented 5 months ago

What about RN check, as was done in https://github.com/AbsaOSS/atum-service/pull/212/files ?

actually even release.yml is quite old, I mean the whole pipeline and its approach

Talked to @miroslavpojer. He's heavily working a new, better solution for the release notes. He suggest not to implement the old thing on any other repo.

github-actions[bot] commented 5 months ago

JaCoCo model module code coverage report - scala 2.13.11

Overall Project 57.44% :green_apple:

There is no coverage information present for the Files changed

github-actions[bot] commented 5 months ago

JaCoCo agent module code coverage report - scala 2.13.11

Overall Project 81.6% :green_apple:

There is no coverage information present for the Files changed

github-actions[bot] commented 5 months ago

JaCoCo slick module code coverage report - scala 2.13.11

Overall Project 87.73% :green_apple:

There is no coverage information present for the Files changed

benedeki commented 5 months ago

Last idea: how about overall values per module? There are big differences.

This is already a long workflow, with a proclivity for typo errors or omitting stuff (like modules). A creation of dedicated action is the way to go forward.