Fix some compatibility issues for building on some platforms

[irieger]

There is a file that was added/changed to include pystring which is a regression to the changes in #1901 which fixed problems with the include directory of pystring by removing the pystring/ directory prefix from the include path.

I also suggest adding std for strlen which also otherwise fails to build in some compiler/OS constellations, at least when building for conan.

[linux-foundation-easycla[bot]]

• :x: - login: @irieger / name: Ingmar Rieger . The commit (00ed94f34db54860b52b2b4dd159379c67cdc77c) is not authorized under a signed CLA. Please click here to be authorized. For further assistance with EasyCLA, please submit a support request ticket.

[irieger]

Please feel free to use my suggestions. To my understanding I'd need to publish my postal address (that is what I assumed is meant by "Mailing Address" in the CLA form) to sign the CLA which I currently don't see doing as this seems shady to me.

[remia]

Thanks @irieger, the pystring issue should be fixed by #1921 but the namespacing of strlen looks good.

Not sure why the CLA wants the postal address, any idea @carolalynn22 ?

[carolalynn]

Hi! All Linux Foundation CLAs require some sort of physical address, it's pretty standard practice in open source. When you contribute under a company CLA, you get to use your company's address instead, so it seems less "personal". I understand being uncomfortable with it - if you would like to read more about the CLA & LF's data protection / security standards (which are pretty good) here's the link: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/legal/privacy-policy

[remia]

Regarding std::strlen, I see a number of other places using just strlen, you didn't encounter issues with those?

[irieger]

Regarding std::strlen, I see a number of other places using just strlen, you didn't encounter issues with those?

That was the only issue when packaging for conan at least.

[irieger]

Hi! All Linux Foundation CLAs require some sort of physical address, it's pretty standard practice in open source. When you contribute under a company CLA, you get to use your company's address instead, so it seems less "personal". I understand being uncomfortable with it - if you would like to read more about the CLA & LF's data protection / security standards (which are pretty good) here's the link: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/legal/privacy-policy

Thanks for the hint. However just having a quick scan through this already makes my feeling about the linux foundation worse than it was before. Openly using tracking is just shit, especially for an organization that I thought was proposing Open Source philosophies. There is no technical need for tracking users. If this was a company contribution I wouldn't care much about the address topic but as this is free time work I'm happy for the team to copy my suggestions but I'm not willing to dive into such a lengthy legal document in a non-native language that doesn't provide me anything but making me more angry about an organization that I thought works for open things. (Part of the open source philosophy for me is to give the users the freedom of their data!)

[carolalynn]

@irieger totally respect your position. Thank you for the pointers regardless!